Figure 1. Pacific Giant Salamander (Credit: Sierra Nystrom)
Figure 2. The Mack Creek study site is located in the HJ Andrews Experimental Forest, Oregon. (Credit: Dana Warren)
Figure 3. Mack Creek, HJ Andrews Experimental Forest, OR (Credit: Oregon State University)
Figure 4. Number of Pacific Giant Salamanders recorded in Mack Creek from 1993-2017. Salamander counts have been seperated by whether they were recorded in the section of creek that runs through old growth forest or forest that was clear cut. Data: Andrews Forest LTER
| Channel Class | Clear Cut | Old Growth |
|---|---|---|
| Cascade | 247 (55%) | 201 (45%) |
| Pool | 31 (41%) | 45 (59%) |
| Side Channel | 90 (55%) | 74 (45%) |
There is not a significant association between forest condition (old growth/clear cut) on where in the channel salamanders are found (pool/side-channel/cascade) for salamanders sampled in 2017. (\(\chi\)2(2) = 5.54, p = 0.063).
Figure 6. Recorded weights of Pacific Giant Salamanders sampled in Mack Creek in 2017 by section of the creek found (CC/OG). The black dot represents the sample mean with error bars representing the range of uncertainty. Data: Andrews Forest LTER
| Creek Section | Mean Weight (g) | Standard Deviation (g) | Sample Size | Standard error | Variance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clear Cut | 7.775870 | 9.904738 | 368 | 0.5163202 | 98.10384 |
| Old Growth | 6.583333 | 8.955275 | 328 | 0.4944723 | 80.19694 |
There is not enough evidence to conclude that mean Pacific Giant Salamander size in the clear cut section of Mack Creek in 2017 (7.78 \(\pm\) 9.9, n = 368) differed significantly from mean Pacific Giant Salamander size in the old growth section of Mack Creek in 2017 (6.58 \(\pm\) 8.96, n = 327) by a two-sided, two sample t-test (t(692.79) = -1.67, p = 0.096). In addition, the effect size between mean sizes is negligible (Cohen’s d = 0.13).
Figure 8. Recorded weights of Pacific Giant Salamanders sampled in Mack Creek in 2017 by channel classification. Data: Andrews Forest LTER
Figure 9. Using a quantile-quantile plot we can assess whther the 2017 salamander sample comes from a population that has weights which are normally distributed. We do not see the linear trend that would suggest normality for all three channel classifications. Data: Andrews Forest LTER
Figure 10. Recorded weights of Pacific Giant Salamanders sampled in Mack Creek in 2017 by channel classification. The black dot represents the sample mean with error bars representing the range of uncertainty.
| Channel Class | Mean Weight (g) | Standard Deviation (g) | Sample Size | Standard error | Variance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cascade | 7.520850 | 9.027747 | 448 | 0.4265209 | 81.50021 |
| Pool | 9.297500 | 13.622957 | 76 | 1.5626603 | 185.58494 |
| Side Channel | 5.676646 | 8.265256 | 164 | 0.6454081 | 68.31446 |
Mean salamander weight (g) differed significantly between the three creek channel classifications (pool, cascade, side-channel) by a one-way ANOVA test (F(2, 684) = 4.22, p = 0.015). Further pairwise testing using pot-hoc Tukey’s HSD revealed that mean salamander weight was only significantly different between side-channel and pool classifications (p = 0.017). Though a significant difference in mean weight was found between salamanders sampled in the pools vs. side-channel sections of Mack Creek in 2017, the effect size was small (Cohen’s d = 0.21).
Gregory S. V. 2016. Aquatic Vertebrate Population Study in Mack Creek, Andrews Experimental Forest, 1987 to present. Environmental Data Initiative. https://doi.org/10.6073/pasta/5de64af9c11579266ef20da2ff32f702. Dataset accessed 11/27/2019.